Abstract:
Background: Cervical cancer is a reproductive organ cancer occurred in the transformation zone of the
external opening of the cervix. Evidences indicate that cervical cancer is the second cause of
morbidity and mortality in developing countries including Ethiopia. Though, the endeavor of the
government to strengthen cervical cancer screening in Ethiopia, the service provision and
screening coverage remains low.
Factors at community, individual, infrastructure and professional levels may challenge the
demand for cervical cancer screening. Therefore, different analysis of possible predictors and
challenges and health education intervention on the hypothesized predictors of demand for
cervical cancer screening might have influence on strengthening the cervical cancer screening
services demand.
Objectives This study was designed to detect different level predictors and challenges of demand for
cervical cancer screening and outline the impact of health education intervention on demand of
women for cervical cancer screening in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.
Methods
The study included a cross sectional, matched case control and descriptive qualitative study
designs to determine different levels of predictors and challenges of demand for cervical cancer
screening; from January to April 2018; and a cluster randomized controlled trial design was used
to evaluate the impact of health education intervention on demand of women for cervical cancer
screening from April to December, 2018 in 30 districts.
Participants involved in the cross-sectional and randomized trial studies were selected randomly;
while purposive sampling was used for the qualitative study to select the key informants and
clients for in-depth interview.
In the cluster randomized controlled trial, data were collected at two time points, in the first
contact, and at six months post health education intervention follow up as second contact.
Potential confounders biases and errors were controlled using stratification, matching, intra-class
correlation coefficient at design stage, and variable adjustment and ITT in the analysis. The
cluster variation was assessed using multi-level mixed effect models, and the impact of the
intervention was evaluated using difference in differences model to estimate the true effect size.
Thematic analysis was used to describe the qualitative data.
Results: At baseline, the percentage of demand for cervical cancer screening was 480 (48%). The intra
class correlation indicated that 18.9% of the total variance in demand was attributable to the
differences across the cluster districts (p-value of < 0.0001). Variables considered in the
community level were mean family size, mean score of community awareness, households to
HEW ratio, health professionals to population ratio per thousands, population to health
institutions ratio, and literacy average across clusters.
Multi-variable analyses revealed that predictors like secondary education (AOR = 5.27, 95% CI
2.12, 13.04) tertiary education (AOR=7.95, 95% CI 2.67, 23.62), having monthly income of
2001-4000 (AOR = 3.23, 95% CI (1.01, 10.36)), those who knew their husbands had two or
more lifetime sexual partner (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI (1.14, 4.50)), being knowledgeable on
cervical cancer (AOR =3.28, 95% CI 1.66, 6.46), having supportive attitude of participants on
cervical cancer screening (AOR = 11.34, 95% CI 5.57, 23.08) and community awareness mean score (AOR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.05, 1.48) were significantly associated with screening practice.
The predictors of cervical cancer screening utilization were also complemented by the qualitative
approach. Though most clients mentioned that the service accessibility and affordability is good,
some said that it is a challenge. Moreover, participants did not hide that there was long waiting
time, crowded clients and service was started later after registration.
Key informants were also assured that the presence of challenges for cervical cancer screening
service provision; including low community awareness, absence of cervical cancer screening
service structure, loss to follow up, shortage of trained professionals, staff turnover and poor
sustainability of supplies. This finding implies that an increase in awareness of the community
on cervical cancer and mitigate challenges might improve the low screening coverage in
Ethiopia. Hence, it informs the importance of health education interventional study.
Comparing the intervention group with control group at baseline, the overall demand of
participants for cervical cancer screening was 39.14% in the intervention and 42.3% in the
control group; with no significant difference (p value = 0.397). However, following the
intervention, the proportion of overall demand was increased to 86.2% in the intervention and
52.4% in control group with significant difference in differences of 36.9% (p value = 0.000).
There are no differences observed when demand is analyzed using PP & ITT.
Conclusions: The proportion of demand for cervical cancer screening among participants in the baseline data
was low. Variables like having secondary and tertiary education, monthly income, the
knowledge and attitude on cervical cancer and awareness of the women on their husband’s
increased number of lifetime partner were positively associated with demand for cervical cancer
screening.
Distance of the service area, the cost of the service, duration of service provision, the approach
of the providers and screening environment were among the challenges repeatedly mentioned
that hamper screening for cervical cancer. Moreover, poor knowledge of the community on
cervical cancer, low screening supplies and trained professionals, professional turnover, poor
referral system, and lack of infrastructure were among the challenges mentioned for cervical
cancer screening,
The provision of health education intervention on cervical cancer improves the demand of adult
women for cervical cancer screening compared to the control groups.
Recommendation
For professionals: It would be better if health professionals work on health education and
motivation of the community for cervical cancer screening utilization and priority should be
given for those who are in reproductive age of women that are at high risk.
For policy makers and program planer: it is important to establish decentralized screening
services and plan to train sufficient health professionals for the accessibility of the services by
all the community