mirage

The prevalence and root causes of surgical site infections in public versus private hospitals in Ethiopia: a retrospective observational cohort study

DSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fisha, Kidanie
dc.contributor.author Azage, Muluken
dc.contributor.author Mulat, Getasew
dc.contributor.author Sisay, Koku
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-01T07:14:00Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-01T07:14:00Z
dc.date.issued 2021-01-01
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/3006
dc.description Healthcare-associated infections (HIAs) are a significant source of preventable morbidity and mortality [1–3]. More than 30% of the HIA are surgical site infections (SSI) defined as infections related to operative procedures that occur at or near surgical incisions within 30 days of the procedure or within 90 days if prosthetic materials are implanted at surgery [4]. Surgical site infections may extend from the skin and superficial subcutaneous tissues of incision sites to deep subcutaneous tissues and organ spaces [5]. Due to poor infection prevention practices among health care facilities in low and middle-income countries, the incidence of SSI is substantially higher than in high-income countries [6, 7] en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Healthcare-associated illnesses, of which surgical site infection is the most common are significant causes of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and root causes of surgical site infections in public versus private hospitals in Ethiopia. Methods: An institution based retrospective observational cohort study was conducted among patients who underwent surgical procedures at public and private health facilities from March 15 to April 15, 2018. Samples were selected by the simple random sampling technique, and data extracted from the patient’s medical chart, operation, and anesthesia notes. Data were entered using Epi info version 7 and analyzed using STATA 14. Binary logistic regression was fitted to identify factors associated with surgical site infections in private and public hospitals. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed to assess the strength of associations. Variables with a p-value less than 0.05 in the multivariable logistic regression model considered as significant predictors of surgical site infections. Result: The overall prevalence of surgical site infections was 9.9% (95%CI: 7.8, 12.5). The prevalence of the infections was higher in procedures performed in public hospitals (13.4%) compared to private hospitals (6.5%). Rural residence (AOR = 0.13, 95%CI: 0.034 0.55), clean-contaminated and dirty wound (AOR = 12.81, 95%CI: 4.42 37.08) were significant predictors of the infections in private hospitals. Similarly, clean-contaminated and dirty wounds (AOR = 4.37, 95%CI: 1.88 10.14), length of hospital stay≥6 days (AOR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.11 7.33), and surgical operation time of over 1 h (AOR = 15.24, 95%CI: 4.48 51.83) were such factors in public hospitals. Conclusion: The prevalence of surgical site infections was high, and significant differences were also observed between public and private hospitals. Clean-contaminated and dirty wounds, prolonged operation, and length of hospital stay were predictors of surgical site infections among patients in public hospitals, whereas clean-contaminated wound and rural dwellings were predicted the infections among patients operated in the private hospital en_US
dc.description.sponsorship uog en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Patient Safety in Surgery en_US
dc.subject Surgical site infection, Root causes, Private versus public hospital, Ethiopia en_US
dc.title The prevalence and root causes of surgical site infections in public versus private hospitals in Ethiopia: a retrospective observational cohort study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search in the Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account